Teorias das Relações Internacionais

---

O percurso abaixo foi elabordo por Victor Coutinho Lage, da Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA).

ABRAHAMSEN, Rita. Internationalists, Sovereigntists, Nativists: Contending Visions of World Order in Pan-Africanism. Review of International Studies. Cambridge, v. 46, n. 1, p. 56-74, 2020.

ACHARYA, Amitav; BUZAN, Barry (ed.). Non-Western International Relations Theory:Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Ed. Routledge, 2010.

ACHARYA, Amitav; BUZAN, Barry. The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2019.  

ANIEVAS, Alexander; MANCHANDA, Nivi; SHILLIAM, Robbie (eds.). Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Colour Global Line. London: Ed. Routledge, 2015.

ANIEVAS, Alexander; MATIN, Kamran (ed.). Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée. London and New York: Ed. Rowman & Littlefield, 2016. Disponível em: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/68106/. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020. Pré-publicação do livro autorizado pelos autores.

ANIEVAS, Alexander; NIŞANCIOĞLU, Kerem. How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism. London: Ed. Pluto Press, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pb6f. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020.

ASHLEY, Richard K. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. Cambridge, v. 38, n. 2, p. 225-286, 1984. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/poverty-of-neorealism/833C3806BE4A3147CA23D8840D15583C. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020.

ASHLEY, Richard K. Untying the Sovereign State: a double reading of the anarchy problematique. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 17, n. 2, p. 227-262, 1988. Disponível em: http://pos-graduacao.uepb.edu.br/ppgri/bibliografia-para-consulta/. Acesso em 11 de setembro de 2020.

ASHLEY, Richard; WALKER, R.B.J. Conclusion: Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. Oxford, v. 34, n. 3, p. 367-416, 1990. Special Issue: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissidence in International Studies.

ASHLEY, Richard; WALKER, R.B.J. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. Oxford, v. 34, n. 3, p. 259-268, 1990. Special Issue: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissidence in International Studies. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/mod/folder/view.php?id=2619679. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020.

AXELROD, Robert; KEOHANE, Robert. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics. Cambridge, v. 38, n. 1, p. 226-254, 1985. Disponível em: http://pos-graduacao.uepb.edu.br/ppgri/bibliografia-para-consulta/. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2011.

BALLESTRIN, Luciana Maria de Aragão. Modernidade/Colonialidade sem “Imperialidade”? O Elo Perdido do Giro Decolonial. DADOS: Revista de Ciências Sociais. Rio de Janeiro, v. 60, n. 2, p. 505-540, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0011-52582017000200505&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020. 

BARBOSA, Muryatan Santana. Pan-Africanismo e Relações Internacionais: Uma Herança (Quase) Esquecida. Carta Internacional. Belo Horizonte, v. 11, n. 1, p. 144-162, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/347. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020.

BARTELSON, Jens. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 1995. 

BARTELSON, Jens. Blasts from the Past: War and Fracture in the International System. International Political Sociology. Oxford, v. 10, n. 4, p.352-368, 2016.

BARTELSON, Jens. Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. London: Ed. Routledge, 2014.

BARTELSON, Jens. The Critique of the State. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

BARTELSON, Jens. War in International Thought. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

BASARAN, Tugba; BIGO, Didier; GUITTET, Emmanuel-Pierre; WALKER, R.B.J.(ed.). International Political Sociology:Transversal Lines. New York: Ed. Routledge, 2017.

BEIER, Marshall J. (ed.). Indigenous Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

BEIER, Marshall J. International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory. New York: Ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

BLANEY, David L.; TICKNER, Arlene B. International Relations in the Prison of Colonial Modernity. International Relations. New York, v. 31, n. 1, p. 71-75, 2017.

BLANEY, David L.; TICKNER, Arlene B. Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 45, n. 3, p. 1-17, 2017.

BUGIATO, Caio; GARCIA, Ana Saggioro ; RAMOS, Leonardo. Marxismo e Relações Internacionais: Um Breve Balanço. Estudos Internacionais. Belo Horizonte, v. 5, n. 3, p. 126-134, 2017. Disponível em: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/estudosinternacionais/article/view/17727. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020.

BULL, Hedley. A Sociedade Anárquica: um estudo da ordem na política mundial. Brasília: Ed. Universidade de Brasília, cap. 3, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.funag.gov.br/loja/index.php?route=product/product&path=78&product_id=401. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2020.

BURKE, Anthony ; FISHER, Stefanie; MITCHELL, Audra; DALBY, Simon; LEVINE; Daniel J. Planet Politics: A manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1-25, 2016.

CALLINICOS, Alex; ROSENBERG, Justin. Uneven and Combined Development: the Social-Relation Substratum of “the International”? An Exchange of Letters. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, v. 21, n. 1, p.77-112, 2008. 

CAMPBELL, David. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of identity. Minneapolis: Ed. University of Minnesota Press, 1992.

CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh. Planetary Crises and the Difficulty of Being Modern. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 26, n. 3, p.1-24, 2018.

CHAMON, Paulo; LAGE, Victor Coutinho. Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson. Carta Internacional. Belo Horizonte, v. 10, n. 3, p. 59-76, 2015.

CHANDLER, David. The Transvaluation of Critique in the Anthropocene. Global Society. UK, v. 33, n. 1, p. 26-44, 2018. Disponível em: https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/q8qvx/the-transvaluation-of-critique-in-the-anthropocene. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020. Manuscrito aceito pelos autores.

CHANDLER, David; CUDWORTH, Erika; HIBDEN, Stephen.Anthropocene, Capitalocene and Liberal Cosmopolitan IR: a response to Burke et al.’s ‘Planet Politics’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 46, n. 2, p. 1-19, 2017. Disponível em: https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/84qw3. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020. Manuscrito aceito pelos autores.

CHANDLER, David; REID, Julian. ‘Being in Being’: Contesting the Ontopolitics of Indigeneity. The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms. E.U., v. 23, n. 3, p. 251-268, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10848770.2017.1420284. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020.

CHOWDRY, Geeta; NAIR, Sheila (eds.). Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: reading race, gender and class. London: Ed. Routledge, 2002.

COX, Robert. Gramsci, Hegemonia e Relações internacionais: Um Ensaio sobre o Método. In: GILL, Stephen. Gramsci, materialismo histórico e relações internacionais. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. UFRJ, 2007. 

COX, Robert W. Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. In: KEOHANE, R. O. (ed.). Neorealism and Its Critics. Nova York: Ed, Columbia University Press, cap. 8, p. 204-254, 1986. Disponível em: http://pos-graduacao.uepb.edu.br/ppgri/bibliografia-para-consulta/. Acesso em 12 de setembro de 2020.

DAWOOD, Layla. China’s Military Modernization: International Systemic Change through Internal Balancing? In: ORSI, Davide; AVGUSTIN, J. R.; NURNUS, Max (eds.). Realism in Practice: An Appraisal. Bristol: Ed. E-International Relations Publishing, cap. 6, p. 72-84, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/08/chinas-military-modernisation/. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020.

DER DERIAN, James (ed.). International Theory: Critical Investigations. New York: Ed. New York University Press, 1995.

DONNELLY, Jack. The Discourse of Anarchy in IR. International Theory. International Theory. Cambridge, v .7, n. 3, p. 393-425, 2015.

DONNELLY, Jack. Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 139-170, 2006. Special Issue.

DOTY, Roxanne Lynn. The Bounds of “Race” in International Relations. Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 443-461, 1993.

DUZGUN, Eren. International Relations, Historical Sociology and the Eurocentrism Debate. Spectrum Journal of Global Studies. Ankara, v. 8, n. 1, 2017.

DUZGUN, Eren. Against Eurocentric Anti-Eurocentrism: International Relations, Historical Sociology and Political Marxism. Journal of International Relations and Development. [s.l.], v. 23, p. 285-307, 2020.

EBERLE, Jakub. Narrative, desire, ontological security, transgression: fantasy as a factor in international politics. Journal of International Relations and Development. [s.l.], v. 22, p. 243-268, 2017.

EILSTRUP-SANGIOVANNI, Mette. The End of Balance-of-Power Theory? A Comment on Wohlforth et al.’s “Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History”. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 347-380, 2009.

ENLOE, Cynthia. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: Ed. University of California Press, 2014.

ENLOE, Cynthia. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: Ed. University of California Press, 2004.

EPSTEIN, Charlotte. Who Speaks? Discourse, the subject and the study of identity in international politics. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 327-350, 2011.

EPSTEIN, Charlotte. Theorizing Agency in Hobbes’ Wake: The Rational Actor, the Self, or the Speaking Subject?. International Organization. Cambridge, v. 67, n. 2, p. 287-316, 2013.

FISHEL, Stefanie; BURKE, Anthony; MITCHELL, Audra; DALBY, Simon; LEVINE, Daniel. Defending Planet Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 46, v. 2, p. 1-11, 2017.

GARCIA, Ana Saggioro. Hegemonia e Imperialismo: Caracterizações da Ordem Mundial Capitalista após a Segunda Guerra Mundial. Contexto Internacional. Rio de Janeiro, v. 32, n. 1, p.155-177, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-85292010000100005&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020.

GILL, Andrea; PIRES, Thula. From Binary to Intersectional to Imbricated Approaches: Gender in a Decolonial and Diasporic Perspective. Contexto Internacional. Rio de Janeiro, v. 41, n. 2, p. 275-302, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292019000200275. Acesso em 12 de setembro de 2020.

GILL, Stephen. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. New York: Ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

GILPIN, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 1981.

GOULD, Harry (Ed.). The Art of World Making:Nicholas Greenwood Onuf and his critics. New York: Ed. Routledge, 2017.

GRIECO, Joseph M. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: a Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. In: BALDWIN, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. Disponível em: http://ir.rochelleterman.com/node/213. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020.

GROVE, Jairus Victor. Savage Ecology: War and Geopolitics at the End of the World. Durham: Ed. Duke University Press, 2019.   

GROVE, Jairus Victor. The Geopolitics of Extinction: from the Anthropocene to the Eurocene. In: MACCARTHY, Daniel R. Technology and World Politics: an introduction. Nova York: Ed. Routledge, 2018. 

GROVOGUI, Siba N. Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy:Memories of International Order and Institutions. New York: Ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

GROVOGUI, Siba N. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 315-338, 2002.

GUILHOT, Nicolas (ed.). The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

GUZZINI, Stefano. Power, Realism and Constructivism. London: Ed. Routledge, 2013.

GUZZINI, Stefano; URT, João Nackle. Uma Reconstrução do Construtivismo nas Relações Internacionais. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD. Dourados, v. 2, n. 4, p. 376-429, 2013. Disponível em: http://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/moncoes/article/view/3109. Acesso em 12 de setembro de 2020.

HENDERSON, Errol A. Hidden in Plain Sight: Racism in International Relations Theory. In. ANIEVAS, Alexander; MANCHANDA, Nivi; SHILLIAM, Robbie (eds.). Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Colour Global Line. Londres: Ed. Routledge, cap. 2, 2015.

HERZ, Monica; YAMATO, Roberto Vilchez. As Transformações das Regras Internacionais sobre a Violência na Ordem Mundial Contemporânea. DADOS: Revista de Ciências Sociais. Rio de Janeiro, v. 61, n. 1, p. 3-45, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0011-52582018000100003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020.

HOBSON, John M. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

HOBSON, John M.; SAJED, Alina. Navigating Beyond the Eurofetishist Frontier of Critical IR Theory: Exploring the Complex Landscapes of Non-Western Agency. International Studies Review. Oxford, v. 19, n. 4, p. 547-572, 2017. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/19/4/547/4056212. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020.

HOBSON, John M.; SHARMAN, J. C. The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: tracing the social logics of hierarchy and political change. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 63-98, 2005.

HOFFMANN, Stanley. “An American Social Science – International Relations”. Daedalus. England, v. 106, n. 3, p. 41-60, 1977. Disponível em: https://www.amherst.edu/sitesearch?keyword=an%20american%20social%20science#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=an%20american%20social%20science&gsc.page=1. Acesso em: 12 de setembro de 2020.

IKENBERRY, John G. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Ed. Princeton University Press, 2000.

INAYATULLAH, Naeem; BLANEY, David. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Ed. Routledge, 2004.

JABRI, Vivienne. War, Security and the Liberal State. Security Dialogue. [s.l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 47-64, 2006.

KAPOOR, Ilan. Cold critique, faint passion, bleak future: Post-Development’s surrender to global capitalism, Third World Quarterly. UK, v. 38, n. 12, 2017. Special Issue.

KAPOOR, Ilan. Psychoanalysis and development: contributions, examples, limits. Third World Quarterly. UK, v. 35, n. 7, p. 1120-1143, 2014.

KAPOOR, Ilan. Psychoanalysis and GlObal. Lincoln: Ed. University of Nebraska Press, 2018.

KAPOOR, Ilan. The Queer Third World. Third World Quarterly. UK, v. 63, n. 9, p. 1611-1628, 2015.

KAUFMAN, Stuart J.; LITTLE, Richard; WOHFORTH, William C. (eds.). The Balance of Power in World History. New York: Ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

KEOHANE, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Ed. Princeton University Press, 1984.

KEOHANE, Robert. International Institutions: Two Approaches (1988). In: DER DERIAN, James (ed.). International Theory: Critical Investigations. New York: Ed. New York University Pres, cap. 11, p. 279-307, 1995. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/course/view.php?id=73305. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

KEOHANE, Robert O. Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War. In: BALDWIN, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. New York: Ed. Columbia University Press, 1993.

KRASNER, Stephen D. Causas Estruturais e Consequências dos Regimes Internacionais: Regimes como Variáveis Intervenientes. Revista Sociologia Política. Curitiba, v. 20, n. 42, p. 93-110, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-44782012000200008&lng=pt&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

KRASNER, Stephen. The Durability of Organized Hypocrisy. In: KALMO, Hent; SKINNER, Quentin (eds.) Sovereignty in Fragments: the past, present and future of a contested concept. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

LAGE, Victor Coutinho. Desigual e Combinado: as “Interpretações do Brasil” diante do Complexo Prisional das “Teorias de Relações Internacionais”. In: MUÑOZ, Luciano da Rosa; SPODE, Raphael (org.). Relações Internacionais para um Mundo em Mutação:Policentrismo e Diálogo Transdisciplinar. Curitiba: Ed Appris, no prelo(a).

LAGE, Victor Coutinho. Interpretations of Brazil, Contemporary (De)Formations. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Relações Internacionais) – Instituto de Relações Internacionais, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/colecao.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=27613@1. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

LAGE, Victor Coutinho. Interpretations of Brazil and Global Capitalism. Latin American Perspectives. [s.l.] v. 46, n. 4, p. 137-153, 2019.

LAGE, Victor Coutinho; CHAMON, Paulo Henrique. Resisting the Denial of Coevalness in International Relations: Provincializing, Perspectivism, Border Thinking. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. Brasília, v. 59, n. 2, p. 1-17, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200205&lng=en&tlng=en. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

LAPID, Yosef. The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly. Oxford, v. 33, n. 3, p. 235-254, 1989.

LAPID, Yosef; KRATOCHWIL, Friedrich (eds.). The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Boulder: Ed. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1996.

LITTLE, Richard. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

LOBELL, Steven E.; RIPSMAN, Norrin M.; TALIAFERRO, Jeffrey W. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

MALINIAK, Daniel; PETERSON, Susan; TIERNEY, Michael J. TRIP Around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries. Williamsburg, VA: Ed. Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, 2012. Disponível em: https://trip.wm.edu/data/our-surveys/faculty-surveys. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

MALMVIG, Helle. State Sovereignty and Intervention: a Discourse Analysis of Interventionary and Non-interventionary Practices in Kosovo and Algeria. London: Ed. Routledge, 2006.

MATIN, Kamran. Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 19, n. 2, p.1-25, 2012.

MORAVCSIK, Andrew. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics”. International Organization. Cambridge, v. 51, n. 4, p. 513-553, 1997. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/mod/resource/view.php?id=2999543&forceview=1. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

MORGENTHAU, Hans J. Política entre as Nações. Brasília: Ed. Universidade de Brasília, cap. 1 e 3, 2003. Disponível em: http://funag.gov.br/biblioteca/index.php?route=product/product&path=78&product_id=553. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

MORTON, Adam David. Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Economy. London: Ed. Pluto Press, 2007.

MUÑOZ, Luciano da Rosa; SPODE, Raphael. Pensamento com teoria: alternativas para o campo de Relações Internacionais no Brasil e na Índia. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD. Dourados, v. 8, n. 15, p. 336-365, 2019. Disponível em: http://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/moncoes/article/view/11551. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

NEOCLEOUS, Mark. The Police of Civilization: the war on terror as civilizing offense. International Political Sociology. Oxford, v. 5, n. 2, p. 144-159, 2011.

NEOCLEOUS, Mark. War Power, Police Power. Edinburgh: Ed. Edinburgh University Press, 2014.

NEXON, Daniel H. The Balance of Power in the Balance. World Politics. Cambridge, v. 61, n. 2, p. 330-359, 2009. 

NOGUEIRA, João P. Ética e Violência na Teoria das Relações Internacionais: Uma Reflexão a partir do 11 de Setembro. Contexto Internacional. Rio de Janeiro, v. 25, n. 1, p. 81-102, 2003. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292003000100003. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

ONUF, Nicholas Greenwood. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. London: Ed. Routledge, 2013.

ONUF, Nicholas Greenwood. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: Ed. University of South Carolina Press, 1989.

ORSI, Davide; AVGUSTIN, J. R.; NURNUS, Max (eds.). Realism in Practice: An Appraisal. Bristol: Ed. E-International Relations Publishing, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.e-ir.info/publication/realism-in-practice-an-appraisal/. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

OWENS, Patricia. Economy of Force: Counterinsurgency and the Historical Rise of the Social. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2015.

OWENS, Patricia. Women and the History of International Thought. International Studies Quarterly. Oxford, v. 62, n. 3, p. 467-481, 2018. Disponível em: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/72429/. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020. Pré-publicação autorizada pelos autores.

PERSAUD, Randolph B.; SAJED, Alina (eds.). Race, Gender, and Culture in International Relations: Postcolonial Perspectives. London: Ed. Routledge, 2018. 

PERSAUD, Randolph B.; WALKER, R.B.J.Apertura: Race in International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. [s.l.], v. 26, n. 4, p. 373-376, 2001.

PICQ, Manuela. Rethinking IR from the Amazon. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. Brasília, v. 59, n. 2, p. 1-17. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200202&lng=en&tlng=en. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

PICQ, Manuela. Visões Indígenas Desafiando o Global: Mulheres Kichwa Pluralizando a Soberania. Tradução: Xaman Minillo Korai e João Nackle Urt. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD. Dourados, v. 6, n. 11, 2017. Disponível em: http://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/moncoes/article/view/6934. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

PICQ, Manuela; THIEL, Markus (eds.). Sexualities in World Politics: How LGBTQ Claims Shape International Relations. London: Ed. Routledge, 2015. 

PUAR, Jasbir K. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Ed. Duke University Press, 2017.

PUAR, Jasbir K. The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham: Ed. Duke University Press, 2017.

INOUE, Cristina; TICKNER. Arlene B. Many World, Many Theories? Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. Brasília, v. 59, n. 2, 2016. Special Issue.

RICHTER-MONTPETIT, Melanie. Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex (in IR) But Were Afraid to Ask: The ‘Queer Turn’ in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 46, n. 2, p. 1-21, 2017. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0305829817733131. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

RIPSMAN, Norrin M.; TALIAFERRO, Jeffrey W.; LOBELL, Steven E. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Ed. Oxford University Press, 2016.

ROJAS, Cristina. Acts of Indigenship: Historical Struggles for Equality and Colonial Difference in Bolivia. Citizenship Studies. [s.l.], v. 17, n. 5, p. 581-595, 2013.

ROJAS, Cristina. Contesting the Colonial Logics of the International: toward a relational politics for the pluriverse. International Political Sociology. Oxford, v. 10, n. 4, p. 369-382. Observação: uma tradução para o português foi publicada na revista Monções: ROJAS, Cristina. Contestando as Lógicas Coloniais do Internacional: Rumo a uma Política Relacional para o Pluriverso. Tradução: Paulo Chamon e João Nackle Urt. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD. Dourados, v. 8, n. 15, p. 519-534, 2019. Dossiê Teoria das Relações Internacionais no Brasil. Disponível em: http://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/moncoes/article/view/11556. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

ROSENBERG, Justin. International Relations in the Prison of Political Science. International Relations. [s.l.], v. 30, n. 2, p. 127-153, 2016. Disponível em: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/60241/. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020. Pré-publicação autorizada pelos autores.

ROSENBERG, Justin. The Elusive International. International Relations. [s.l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 90-103, 2017. Disponível em: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/67267/. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020. Pré-publicação autorizada pelos autores.

ROSENBERG, Justin. The Philosophical Premises of Uneven and Combined Development. Review of International Studies. Cambridge, v. 39, n. 3, p. 569-596, 2013.

ROSENBERG, Justin. Trotsky’s error: multiplicity and the secret origins of revolutionary Marxism. Globalizations. [s.l.], v. 17, n. 3, p. 477-497, 2019. Disponível em: https://sussex.academia.edu/JustinRosenberg. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

ROSENBERG, Justin. Uneven and Combined Development: ‘The International’ in Theory and History. In: ANIEVAS, Alexander; MATIN, Kamran (eds.). Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée. New York: Ed. Rowman & Littlefield, cap. 2, 2016.  

ROSENBERG, Justin. Why is There No International Historical Sociology?. European Journal of International Relations.  [s.l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. 307-340, 2006.

SÁ, Miguel Borba de. A Presença Oculta do Marxismo na Teoria de Relações Internacionais: Rosa Luxemburgo e o Primeiro “Grande Debate”. Estudos Internacionais.  Belo Horizonte, v. 5, n. 3, p. 5-21, 2017. Disponível em: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/estudosinternacionais/article/view/15537. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

SAJED, Alina; INAYATULLAH, Naeem. On the Perils of Lifting the Weight of Structures: An Engagement with Hobson’s Critique of the Discipline of IR. Postcolonial Studies. [s.l.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 201- 209, 2016.

SALGADO, Pedro. Agency and geopolitics: Brazilian formal independence and the problem of Eurocentrism in internacional historical sociology. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Cambridge, v. 33, n. 3, p. 432-451, 2020.

SANTOS FILHO, Onofre. Ultra Aequinoxialem Non Peccari: Anarquia, Estado de Natureza e a Construção da Ordem Político-Espacial. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD.Dourados, v. 8, n. 15, p. 486-518, 2019.Dossiê Teoria das Relações Internacionais no Brasil, organizado por João Nackle Urt, Lara Selis e Victor Coutinho Lage. Disponível em: http://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/moncoes/article/view/11553. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

SCHMIDT, Brian C. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. New York: Ed. State University of New York Press, 1998.

SCHWELLER, Randall. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. In: BROWN, Michael E., LYNN-JONES, Sean M.; MILLER, Steven E. (orgs.). The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Realism. Cambridge: Ed. MIT Press, p.249-286, 1995.

SELIS, Lara Martim Rodrigues. Infiltração Clandestina: a Questão da Diferença no Pensamento Latino-americano. Carta Internacional. Belo Horizonte, v. 13, n. 2, p. 171-194, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/807. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

SHILLIAM, Robbie. The Atlantic as a Vector of Uneven and Combined Development. Cambridge Review of International Affairs.  Cambridge, v. 22, n. 1, p. 69-88, 2009. Disponível em: https://robbieshilliam.wordpress.com/writings/. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

SHILLIAM, Robbie (ed.). International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Ed. Routledge, 2011.

SHILLIAM, Robbie. The Black Pacific: anti-colonial struggles and oceanic connections. London: Ed. Bloomsbury, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/the-black-pacific-anti-colonial-struggles-and-oceanic-connections/. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

SMITH, Steve. The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science? British Journal of Politics and International Relations. UK, v. 2, n. 3, p. 374-402, 2000.

SMITH, Steve (ed.). International Relations Theory Today. University Park: Ed. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.

SOLOMON, Ty. The politics of subjectivity in American foreign policy discourses. Ann Arbor, Ed. University of Michigan Press, 2015.

SOUZA, Natália Maria Felix de. Crisis and Critique in International Relations Theory. Tese (Doutorado em Relações Internacionais) – Instituto de Relações Internacionais, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/colecao.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=36376@1. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

SOUZA, Natália Maria Félix de. Crise e Crítica nas Relações Internacionais, com Natália Maria Félix de Souza da PUC-SP (21.11.2019). [s.l.: s.n.], 2019. 1 vídeo (96 min). Publicado pelo canal uspfflch. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVr8Is_kuMI&feature=youtu.be. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

STAVRAKAKIS, Yannis. Enjoying the Nation: A Success Story? In: STAVRAKAKIS, Yannis. The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, Theory, Politics. Edinburgh: Ed. Edinburgh University Press, cap. 5, 2007.

THAKUR, Vineet; DAVIS, Alexander E.; VALE, Peter. Imperial Mission, “Scientific” Method: An Alternative Account of the Origins of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 46, n. 1, p.3-23, 2017. Disponível em: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/81879. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020. Manuscrito aceito pelos autores.

TICKNER, J. Ann. Identity in International Relations Theory: feminist perspectives. In: LAPID, Yosef; KRATOCHWIL, Friedrich (eds.). The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Boulder: Ed. Lynne Rienner Publishers, cap. 8, 1996.

TICKNER, Arlene B. Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London, v. 32, n. 2, p. 295-324, 2003.

TICKNER, Arlene. Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 627-646, 2013.

TICKNER, Arlene B.; WAEVER, Ole (eds.). International Relations Scholarship around the World. London: Ed. Routledge, 2009.

UNEVEN and combined development: theorising the international. [s.l.], [2019]. Disponível em: https://unevenandcombineddevelopment.wordpress.com/writings/. Acesso em: 14 de setembro de 2020.

URT, João Nackle. How Western Sovereignty Occludes Indigenous Governance: the Guarani and Kaiowa Peoples in Brazil. Contexto Internacional. Rio de Janeiro, v. 38, n. 3, p. 865-886, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300865. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

URT, João Nackle; SELIS, Lara Martim Rodrigues; LAGE, Victor Coutinho. A teorização em Relações Internacionais no Brasil importa?. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD, Dourados, v. 8, n. 15, p. 1-21, 2019. Disponível em: http://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/moncoes/article/view/11528. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

URT, João Nackle; SELIS, Lara Martim Rodrigues; LAGE, Victor Coutinho. Dossiê: Teoria das Relações Internacionais no Brasil. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD. Dourados, v. 8, n. 15, 2019.

VILLA, Rafael A. Duarte ; TICKNER, Arlene B. ; SOUZA, Marília Carolina B.; MÁSMELA, Yamile Carolina Cepeda. Comunidades de Relações Internacionais na América Latina: Uma Análise das Tendências a partir do TRIP 2014. Carta Internacional. Belo Horizonte, v. 12, n. 1, p. 224-256, 2017. Disponível em: https://cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/553. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

VITALIS, Robert. White World Order, Black Power Politics:The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca: Ed. Cornell University Press, 2015.

ZALEWSKI, Marysia. All these theories and the bodies keep piling up: theories, theorists, theorizing. In: SMITH, Steve; BOOTH, Ken; ZALEWSKI, Marysia (eds.). International theory: Positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

ZEHFUSS, Maja. Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 315-348, 2001. Disponível em: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:1b8201. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020. Versão pós-revisão por pares aceito pelo autor.

WAEVER, Ole. The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization. Cambridge, v. 52, n. 4, p. 687-727, 1998.

WALT, Stephen M. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. In: BROWN, Michael E., LYNN-JONES, Sean M.; MILLER, Steven E. (orgs.)  The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Realism. Cambridge: Ed. MIT Press, 1995.

WALTZ, Kenneth. Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Lisboa: Ed. Gradiva, 2002.

WALKER, R.B.J. After the Globe, Before the World. Nova York: Ed. Routledge, 2010.

WALKER, R.B.J. Inside/Outside:International Relations as Political Theory. Cambrdige University Press, 1993. Observação: livro traduzido para o português como WALKER, R.B.J. Inside/Outside: Relações Internacionais como Teoria Política. Tradução Luis Carlos Moreira da Silva. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. PUC-Rio, 2012. 

WALKER, R.B.J. Out of Line: Essays on the Politics of Boundaries and the Limits of Modern Politics. London: Ed. Routledge, 2016. 

WEBER, Cynthia. Queer International Relations: Sovereignty, Sexuality and the Will to Knowledge. Oxford: Ed. Oxford University Press, 2016.

WENDT, Alexander. Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. Cambridge, v. 46, n. 2, p. 391-425, 1992. Observação: uma tradução para o português foi publicada na revista Monções: WENDT, Alexander. A Anarquia É o que os Estados Fazem Dela: A Construção Social da Política de Poder. Tradução Rodrigo Duque Estrada. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD. Dourados v. 2, n. 3, p. 420-473, 2013. Disponível em: http://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/moncoes/article/view/2188. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

WENDT, Alexander. Identity and Structural Change in International Politics. In: LAPID, Yosef; KRATOCHWIL, Friedrich (eds.). The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Boulder: Ed. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1996.

WENDT, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Observação: livro traduzido para o português como WENDT, Alexander. Teoria Social da Política Internacional. Tradução Vivian Mannheimer e Paula Vedoveli. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Apicuri, Editora PUC-Rio, 2004.

WOHFORTH, William C.; LITTLE, Richard; KAUFMAN, Stuart J.; KANG, David C.; JONES, Charles A.; HUI, Victoria Tin-Bor; ECKSTEIN, Arthur M.; DEUDNEY, Daniel; BRENNER, William J. Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 155-185, 2007. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354066107076951. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020.

WOHFORTH, William C.; LITTLE, Richard; KAUFMAN, Stuart J.; KANG, David C.; JONES, Charles A.; HUI, Victoria Tin-Bor; ECKSTEIN, Arthur M.; DEUDNEY, Daniel; BRENNER, William J. The Comedy of Errors? A Reply to Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni. European Journal of International Relations. [s.l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 381-388, 2009.

---